We (that is, storytellers) want our books to be read, but in order to do that we also need to entice the reader. There are various weapons … ummm, tools we use to try to find a way to open the curiosity, and this is one. A Blurb, or a storyline (although that’s mainly for the professionals in the field – and why aren’t readers considered smart enough to be in the same league?).
So, here’s the go – which of these would open your curiosity enough to want to read the story?
- Safi Lomas was near the end of her induction training, working the perimeter of a public event with Thom, her mentor and friend, when the device exploded. It killed Thom, and blinded Safi – but she saw more. What she saw was a bullet. What they didn’t find was a bullet. But Safi knows what she saw … and who. She may be legally blind, but she has the dog, a bit of tech, and a way in. If she’s the only person who knows who the mole is, where he is, and what he plans, what she has to do is bring him to justice, or …
- A rookie spook is abandoned to her own devices, wiles and wit when her opponent demonstrates intel he couldn’t possibly have without insider knowledge. Can a blind covert operative stop the terror group detonating another bomb despite her lack of support – and the mole who outs her?
- A blind ex-field operative infiltrates a high-risk situation to prove there’s a mole – and murderer – at the centre of the agency, but when two people see the same thing differently, what is evidence and what is illusion?
- Safi Lomas holds the access card to something everyone wants – and she’s going to use it to bring the enemy to her, the broken and blind and angry young woman they see, to enable her to finally do her job – and disable the mole and murderer who killed her friend and mentor before he detonates another device.
Of course, I have a favourite, but I’m the writer, so I’m allowed. It also makes my bias too strong to see clearly (a bit blinded, you might think).
Which of these – if any (and please tell me if it’s nada, and why if possible) – push that button of curiosity?
The story may be complete by end Feb, and out and about in March (this isn’t set in stone, more like mud, so patience may be required).
If you add Safi’s name to #2 that would be my favorite. It’s succinct and adding Safi’s name personalizes it.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks, I’ll work it in. It always helps me to hear the ideas of people who read, and not rely on my own headspace!
LikeLike
I get frustrated with professional blurbs but mostly when they say a book is something it’s not.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I agree – it should be what it says. I’d like to interest a reader who is happy to read the whole story, and let the people who don’t like that story know that it isn’t for them!
My motto: gimme the story, nothing but the story!
I know, I’m a bit weird, but … s’life! Thanks for responding.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I agree. I’ve been so disappointed when a blurb tells me something’s hilarious and I have to work to crack a grin. It’s best if they just give the synopsis and let the reader decide the emotional part.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I had to unfollow and then click on refollow just then so I could respond! Sorry, but sometimes these things are … beyond comprehension! Computers and software, that is, but yes, also the overblown descriptions that don’t fit the story!
Thank you.
LikeLiked by 1 person
lol I was despondent that you weren’t originally following me. 😉 No problem. WP has some quirks…(some?). If you need a beta reader (I can’t believe I’m offering), let me know.
LikeLiked by 1 person
that sounds like an offer too good to refuse – thank you.
WP has a lot of quirks; I’ve wondered what’s happened to people I follow, look them up, and hey presto, it says I’m not following! Apparently, it’s not uncommon – a bit weird, though …
LikeLike
I actually like all four write ups with #1 being the most descriptive, so it gives the clearest picture, but I don’t know about word limits, as publishers always have them. I like ‘rookie spook’ in #2 and ‘blind ex-field operative’ in #3, but they seem contradictory to each other. I also like the way Safi is described as a ‘broken and blind and angry young woman’ in #4 and I wonder if you could combine these three different descriptions of her together in some manner.
LikeLiked by 1 person
That sounds like an interesting endeavour! I’ll try, but it may be too much … however, I’ll never know if it don’t give it a damn good go!
Thanks
LikeLiked by 1 person
How about this:
1. Safi Lomas a rookie spook was sidelined during her induction training, when a device exploded killing her co-worker and causing her to become be legally blind. Now she has a dog, some tech that will enable her to do her job, and she hopes for another chance back into the agency, to stop the terror group from detonating another bomb. She’s is aware of the mole, but the broken down, blind and angry young woman still needs to prove it, so she can bring him to justice, or die trying.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Okay, but needs to be tightened considerably or it’s passive.
I’ll work on it – these things always take more effort than writing the story!
LikeLiked by 1 person
I have a tendency to over explain things and you are better at making things tighter.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I wish it were easy, Jim, but I struggle to keep it tight – and the final revision of a story is always to make it ‘tighter’. Can’t say it always works …
LikeLiked by 1 person
I actually like #3 best. It’s the sharpest to me and so intriguing. I love the tension and suspense set up by the last line. The other 3 were confusing to me, too much information crammed in, and I had to read them twice. I looked through the other comments – funny how we all have different preferences.
LikeLiked by 1 person
And that’s a good thing – otherwise, there’d be only one genre, and probably only one style of story!
I like short and sharp, active and assertive, but one of my writing group calls my efforts ‘cutting to the bone’ – not sure if that’s good or bad …
LikeLiked by 1 person
#2 for me, I think, Cage.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks – I’m noting it all in the workbook!
LikeLiked by 1 person
They all sound interesting and read-worthy. #4 makes me a little edgy because I don’t like the enemy coming in to her turf, because she has to have a safe space. If you have her draw them to someplace other than her house, where she could have it rigged with traps, that could be fun. I like the idea of #1 most because she has the dog to help her. If you don’t use the dog, is there a way some other “accidental support person” could be introduced? Just talking off the top of my head. I know you want to make her tough and a one-word army despite the fact she is blind, but everybody could use a little help, sighted or not…
LikeLiked by 1 person
p.s. i mean one-woman army, not one-word!
LikeLiked by 1 person
LoL – yes, I understood that! She does have to go in without support though … it won’t be at her house … and she won’t be [no, can’t tell you that yet, but she finds something or someone unexpected …].
Thanks!
LikeLiked by 1 person
happy to oblige. I’m at 73% on the Hella story and should finish tonight 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
I await with bated breath …
LikeLiked by 1 person
#2 for me 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
There are aspects to all of them that I like but I think I like #4 best.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks – noted.
LikeLiked by 1 person
You’re welcome.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I like #2 best, and suggest a couple of tweaks:
Rookie spook Safi Lomas is abandoned to her own devices, wiles and wit when her opponent demonstrates intel he couldn’t possibly have without insider knowledge. Now she has the dog, a bit of tech, and a way in. But can a broken, blind, and angry young woman stop the terror group detonating another bomb despite her lack of support – and the mole who outs her?
These things are tough to write! You have to pack a lot into a small space without confusing the reader, as Diana said earlier.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Now this is something that really gels it all into a spicy little package! Thank you!
LikeLiked by 1 person
You’re welcome!
LikeLiked by 1 person
#3 I think. Succinct and to the point.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks – I like succinct.
LikeLike
I like 3. The blind ex-operative who sees things differently…it evokes power mystery and intrigue 😁
LikeLiked by 1 person
For me it’s a toss-up between 3 and 4, although I do like the mention of evidence versus illusion in 3.
LikeLiked by 1 person
It depends on the genre and the audience. The third one is speaking to me, “ex-field operative”. You had me there. I can’t decide between 1 and 4. Both are good.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks; it’s hard for me to find just enough to entice the right reader …
LikeLiked by 1 person
A rookie spook is abandoned to her own devices, wiles and wit when her opponent demonstrates intel he couldn’t possibly have without insider knowledge. Can a blind covert operative stop the terror group detonating another bomb despite her lack of support – and the mole who outs her?
A blind ex-field operative infiltrates a high-risk situation to prove there’s a mole – and murderer – at the centre of the agency, but when two people see the same thing differently, what is evidence and what is illusion?
I know this is two choices of your four Cage – but they are very similiar story wise, these would be my two penneths for one choice.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Cage, I finished this morning. Will write review in near future. Very action-packed book!
LikeLiked by 1 person
I look forward to knowing how you feel about it.
LikeLiked by 1 person
#1: I really liked it!
LikeLiked by 1 person
excellent, I’ll make sure you’re on the list to see the new one as soon as it’s ready.
LikeLiked by 1 person
fantastic
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’m thinking 1, 2, and 4 in that order
LikeLiked by 1 person
Hey, sorry. I lost internet on Monday and am just now catching up on things. If you do need a beta reader, my email is #### . I didn’t want you to think because you didn’t hear from me that I was backing out. 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
I have another beta reader who lives in rural Australia and has intermittent internet. Actually, intermittent is probably better than they get. I’ve added you to the list – and thank you!
LikeLiked by 1 person
I like #1 best as a back blurb although I like the phrase “broken, blind and angry” from #4. I also like the question from #3 “but when two people see the same thing differently, what is evidence and what is illusion?” but you have to show the second person as you only mention Safi. I liked knowing her name which probably pulled me to #1.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks, it helps me to hear what others think – I tend to be blinded by close association.
LikeLiked by 1 person
My favorite opening sentence of any book was written by Tom Robbins in Fierce Invalids Home From Hot Climates
“The naked parrot looked like a human fetus spliced onto a Kosher chicken”
LikeLiked by 1 person
What a picture!
LikeLiked by 1 person